About DECI-2

Welcome to Evaluation & Communication in Practice – a workspace for DECI-2: Developing Evaluation & Communication Capacity in Information Society Research – an IDRC-funded research project.   This site includes the outcomes of the earlier DECI-1 project (Developing Evaluation Capacity in ICT4D) that focused only on UFE-mentoring in Asia.

We are providing researchers with mentoring in Utilization Focused Evaluation (UFE) and in Research Communication. The following two briefs provide a background on each of these approaches:

UFE in 3 pages

Research Communication in 3 pages

DECI-2 is broader in scope and coverage:

  • DECI-2 provides capacity development in both evaluation and communication for IDRC research projects in the Information & Networks Program (I&N).
  • DECI-2 offers mentoring in Utilization-Focused Evaluation – an approach to evaluation that focuses on producing evaluations that are actually utilized.  At the same time, DECI-2 offers mentoring in Research Communication, to assist projects in developing and implementing their communication strategies.
  • DECI-2 is a research project aimed at test-driving capacity development in these two fields.  An assumption is that the combined effect of UFE and Research Communication will enhance the internal learning culture within projects; and it will enable projects to focus attention early on communication planning to enhance the reach and use of research outcomes.

Our Research Questions:

  1. To what extent can the introduction and UFE and Research Communication happen in a combined manner?
  2. What are the factors that shape the operationalization of an integrated UFE and Communication mentoring, (e.g. the nature of the projects, the readiness by staff for UFE and Communication, the nature of the ‘key evaluation questions’, the range of communication functions incorporated into a Communication Strategy, etc.)?
  3. To what extend can mentoring and implementation happen in an integrated manner (for instance: the same project staff learned UFE and Research Communication) Vs. in a parallel manner (similar steps were introduced between UFE and Research Communication but were implemented by separate teams)?
  4. What are the outputs, outcomes and (ideally) impacts that demonstrate the added value of an integrated approach to UFE and Research Communication mentoring?





  1. Good to hear about it. It will be helpful to sharpen our undertsnading from different pratices. It’s also a scope for sharing our ideas and best pratices.

  2. Hi, am unable to open the links to DECI-2 page BRIEF or DECI-2_presentation

    • Shubh: they open here. Please try again! Ricardo

  3. This is astonishing friends..Keep it up!

  4. I found the UFE primer very useful and helped think about a current proposal to try and develop an institutional framework, for universities, that could help faculty increase their capacity to do reseach, as well as their ability to create learning environments where students developed their ability to learn independently. In particular it helped to reflect on how to gain participation and institutional engagement; plus a healthy reminder of how context is fundamental.

    • Hello Mark Hepworth:
      Thanks for your commentary on the UFE Primer. We look forward to hearing how your proposal evolves and which principles work in your context.

  5. iam so glad to have this information that I think will help a great deal, i am a communicator by profession but practicing evaluator . I think this is a chance to marry the two since it is one thing to do research and another to effectively communicate your evaluation report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s